This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Next revision | Previous revision | ||
comparison_of_site_indices [2012/04/05 19:16] ddrummond created |
comparison_of_site_indices [2012/07/13 18:12] (current) 128.192.48.132 |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
====== Comparison of Site Indices, Basal Area and Volume ====== | ====== Comparison of Site Indices, Basal Area and Volume ====== | ||
+ | 50 years for 10 Southern Appalachian species on 3 sites (From Doolittle 1958). | ||
+ | ^Species ^Site Index ^Basal Area per acre ^^Volume per acre* ^| | ||
+ | ^ ^Feet ^Sq. Ft. ^Cu. Ft. ^Cords ^Bd.Ft. | | ||
+ | ^Poor Site ^^^^^| | ||
+ | |Shortleaf and pitch pine |50 |159 |3970 |46.7 |9,900 | | ||
+ | |Yellow-Poplar |50 |90 |1700 |20.0 |3,500 | | ||
+ | |White Oak |52 |90 |1726 |20.3 |3,860 | | ||
+ | |Other oaks+ |57 |94 |2041 |24.0 |5,385 | | ||
+ | |Virginia Pine |59 |162 |4180 |49.2 |20,000 | | ||
+ | |White pine |66 |190 |5312 |62.5 |23,920 | | ||
+ | ^Medium Site ^^^^^| | ||
+ | |Shortleaf and pitch pine |65 |166 |5665 |66.6 |22,750 | | ||
+ | |White Oak |66 |100 |2590 |30.5 |8,370 | | ||
+ | |Other Oaks |72 |103 |2954 |34.8 |10,550 | | ||
+ | |Virginia Pine |74 |180 |5440 |64.0 |28,840 | | ||
+ | |Yellow-Poplar |75 |132 |3138 |36.9 |14,510 | | ||
+ | |White Pine |82 |201 |6976 |82.1 |35,964 | | ||
+ | ^Good Site ^^^^^| | ||
+ | |White Oak |79 |106 |3388 |39.9 |13,350 | | ||
+ | |Shortleaf and pitch pine |81 |170 |7487 |88.1 |36,465 | | ||
+ | |Other Oaks |86 |108 |3870 |45.5 |16,300 | | ||
+ | |Virginia Pine |88 |188 |6040 |71.1 |39,116 | | ||
+ | |White Pine |98 |205 |8256 |97.1 |45,328 | | ||
+ | |Yellow-Poplar |100 |172 |5330 |62.7 |32,150 | | ||
+ | |||
+ | *Conversion factor for cordwood was 85 cubic feet per cord. Board-foot volumes are international | ||
+ | 1/8 inch rule. \\ | ||
+ | +Includes scarlet, black, northern red, and chestnut oaks. |